Free «WB I-70 Closing after a Fuel Spill» Essay Paper

Westbound Interstate 70 was closed for Exit 241 due to an accident cleanup, but it was put back into operation the following day, i.e. three hours later. Apparently, the fuel in question that had spilt was diesel fuel and the cause was, as a result, a single semi-truck crash that led to a leakage. During the process of clean up, strategies were put into consideration in order to ensure that everything was initiated in the right step. The implication here was that things were initiated in a professional and legal way so as to make sure that everything was safe from any likely harm and delay.

The HAZMART Regulations were put into consideration as the Colorado State Patrol in Golden took the initiative to tweet that the highway was closed as a result of a single-truck crash that had spilt several gallons of diesel fuel. Fundamentally, the approach was based on the HAZMART Regulations as it cautioned the citizens of the issue at hand. It was based on the regulations of HAZMART regulations content because it acted as a mode of communication to the citizens of Colorado who wanted to use the Westbound Interstate 70. Furthermore, the warning was later elaborated by the county Creek Sheriff’s Office that it was a multiple vehicle and traffic was being diverted through Idaho Springs (Hernandez, 2015).

 

Type of service

Type of assignment

Title of your paper *

Academic level

Pages

Timeframe

Spacing

Currency

  Order now

Another evidence that showed that those HAZMART regulations were followed was that the citizens had been warned despite the proposed diversion, the presence of closing the Westbound Interstate would lead to delays during the cleanup. The other alternative that was proposed by the Sheriff’s office based on the HAZMART regulations was that Westbound Interstate users needed to use alternative routes until the crash had been cleanup. The initiation implied that precautions were being put into consideration based on HAZMART regulation in order to reduce the possible inconvenience as much as possible. Therefore, the above scenario shows that everything has been initiated in the right way, especially based on the contents of the HAZMART Regulations.

It is true as according to the OSHA’S HAWOPER:

OSHA has incomplete authority of over-the-road vehicle procedure. It is true as in case of an oil spill while the material is on the vehicle, the OSHA’s HAZWOPER standards do not cover the service per se. The only entity that the standards are obliged to take on is the urgent situation response personnel who respond to the mishap. Furthermore, in case the operator of the vehicle becomes involved in the accident at hand, he or she is looked at as an emergency responder as well and he or she is covered for by 9 CFR 1910. 120(q). Furthermore, the contents of Hazardous material Transportation Act of 1975 empowered the Secretary of Transportation to designate as hazardous materials (Tseng, 2015).

Furthermore, an assurance was given that the cleanup would take an approximate of two and half hours (Hernandez, 2015). Fundamentally, I can confidently say that everything that was initiated in the cleanup process was undertaken based on legal and professional regulations.

From the above paragraphs is it clear that issues associated with cleanup, issuing of solutions and undertaken tasks at hand, were implemented as per the rules and regulations of HAZMART. The correct procedure was considered because the manner in which communication was passed showed that issues were being undertaken based on a legal and professional perspective. Everything was done legally because the contents of the HAZMART Regulations were considered (Hernandez, 2015). Significantly, the above paragraphs entail that the respondents were the Colorado Department of Transportation, Colorado State Patrol and the County Sheriff police. Thus, it was a good approach by the above named responders as they ensured that rules and regulation of road safety were followed to the latter as per the HAZMART regulations.

Stay Connected

Live Chat Order now

According to the article, the cause of the oil spill was due to a single semi-truck crash that led to the leakage of several gallons of diesel fuel. The problem is perceived to have been caused by a crash that involved a semi-truck and a fuel spill. The incident entailed the semi truck hauling dry concrete when it crashed, but the good thing was that no injuries were reported (TheDenverChannel.com Team, 2015).  Thus, the good thing about the whole incident was that proper procedures were taken into consideration and no fatal accident was reported.

Conclusion

As a conclusion: the paper is significant because it talks about issues that often take place on our roads regarding oil spill and the cleanup procedure. The essay shows the challenges that occur on our roads and the strategies that are often initiated with the aim to reduce huge problems that arise from such challenges. It is noted in the above paragraph that the outcome of the accident brought about unity, in terms of assistance. This concerns the presence of the Colorado Department of Transportation, the County Sheriff police and the Colorado State patrol.

The presence of the three arms of the government worked in unison in order to get rid of any further damages on the road. Furthermore, following the HAZNMART Regulations enumerated that they were doing their services based on a professional and legal point of view. Furthermore, the process of dealing with the situation was undertaken in a professional way where communication was spread online and by the sheriff’s office. Offering alternatives also helped as it ensured that things move in the right direction and as normal as possible. Essentially, it is a good real life situation that one can learn from and deal with it appropriately in future.