Georgia’s Approach to Sexual Predators

HomeFree EssaysPsychologyGeorgia’s Approach to Sexual PredatorsBuy Custom Essay
← Psychological Effects of Asthma on ChildrenHuman Behaviour in Social Places →

Buy custom Georgia’s Approach to Sexual Predators essay

The society has been on the for front in a major war against child molestation, abduction and exposure pornographic material or any other type of harassment that may make them feel sexually harassed. The newer changes in the society and people’s different understanding of morality have led to total moral decay in the society. The parents too who are assigned the role of the custodian of these children have in one way or another offended their children sexually. To curb this new threat facing young children’s morality, almost all states in the US have formulated policies/regulations that protect the children from any sexual harm (Dobbert, 2004). Georgia too has laws that protect the vulnerable young children. The following document is an essay that discusses on sexual predator regulations in Georgia.

The Georgian laws on sexual offence are very strict and even minor or first-time offenders are punishable by the law. The Georgia laws have done so much in prevention and prohibiting of acts that would be considered predatory. These laws prohibit such conducts through offering of punishments and demands that deny potential sexual predators the opportunity of committing a crime. There are general punishments to all sexual predators and specific punishment for other sexual offences. Jones, Wampler & Smith (2005) assert when one commits sexual offence against a minor, the law requires the offender to keep a distance of 1,000 feet from child facilities such as schools, parks where children play or visit, swimming pools and bus stops. Moreover, the law demands that such individuals should not stay or work near the children facilities. Thus, the government denies the sexual predators chances of working or staying a in some places. In some cases, the predators are separated from their families especially when they fail to get houses far away from where the children stay. They are also denied the right to be parents especially when they abuse their children sexually. Thus, the law of the states takes away their children from them and hands them to more responsible foster parents. The state also denies them the right to hold special positions in the social places where children might go, and then they are denied the right to hold such a position. It is even worse when sexual predators had trained to work with the children (Jones, Wampler & Smith, 2005). Their jobs are always terminated. They are not allowed to stroll near children facilities. The legislations also demand that sexual offenders should register with the Georgia investigation Bureau and it is mandatory that the offenders should provide their real names and correct address for easy tracking and to see that the offender is observing the regulations about staying close to child facilities. Thus, the Georgian laws demand lifetime monitoring of the sexual predators.

The law provides for different punishments for different crimes. For instance, if a sexual offender rapes a minor (someone below the age of 14 years), the court sentence on such individual is from between 10 to 20 years imprisonment. Aggravated sodomizers may serve imprisonment ranging from 10 to 30 years (Becker & Fanniff, 2006). Like rapist, kidnappers of minors may be sentenced between 10 to 20 years imprisonment. As aggravated sexual battery may serve a jail term that is not less than 10 year and not past 20 years while an aggravated child molestation may earn an individual a prison sentence not less than ten years and which does not supersede 30 years imprisonment.

In case a first offender commit an egregious sexual offences or abducting a child below 14 years, the court shall ignore the first offender status of the criminal once found guilty and still probate the offender the same way as an offender who has been committing the felony. All sexual offenders are expected to register with their local sheriffs at a fee. This fee is always paid annually to the state. All convicted sexual offenders must register with the state apart from those who are convicted in juvenile courts.

The sheriff is expected to keep track of the registry and re-distribute the list in schools, police departments and campuses. The sheriff makes a sexual offender data base system which has the names, address and other personal details of the sexual offenders. If first time offender fails to record his/her home address with the local police maybe because they lack a home street or any other reason, the court always opts to send such a person to life imprisonment. The first offenders who never used violence or weapons may petition the court to be removed from the registry of sexual offenders after serving ten years in correctional facilities (Jones, Wampler & Smith, 2005). Though, their mandatory probation may not be less than a year. The following crimes may make the first offender lose his/her first offender status. For instance, when first offender is found guilty of aggravated assault and has intent to rape, sodomy, child molestation, sexual assault against a child in their custody, tricking a child into indecent sexual activities or incest, such persons may serve probation not less than a year. Though, when they repeat such felonies, they will be treated as second offenders.

The laws are very clear in issues of physical it mostly bases its conviction on physical contact as the reason behind conviction. The conviction of these individuals is based on whether they are guilty or not. Thus, the conviction bases on both solicitation of improper activities and physical contact strongly supported by evidence. Though, physical contact calls for serious conviction of the first offender compared to solicitation and has no impact on subsequent offender (Becker & Fanniff, 2006). When it comes to the successive sexual battery or exploitation of the children, the court changes its stand on the cases first offenders who never used weapons, never caused physical harm to the victim, never engaged in transportation of the victim, did not have intention of harming the victim or did not physically confine the victim. Thus physical and intentional involvement with the victim of sexual battery or exploitation plays a major role in determination of the punishment to be given to suspected predators. However, the Georgian laws do not grant these offenders the right to have a bail or appeal bonds.

Otherwise, Georgians filed a petition that if child predators may choose to murder their victims, or their victims die out of neglect or sexual harassment, then the state should take it as a capital offence and which deserves death penalty. Thus, predators that are murdering, raping, kidnapping and had engaged in any sexual felony previously are looking for the ultimate punishment of death sentence (Saxe & Cross, 2001). This is believed to be the maximum sentence that the Georgian state may offer to the most dangerous sexual predator.

Saxe & Cross (2001) contend that psychologists are challenge to work extra hard since the cases of sexual predator are falling out of their range of experience. Thus, the citizens believe that sexual predators may not change at all. This has forced them to appeal for harsh rules ever in human existence: death penalty. The Georgian sexual offender and predator rules are very adequate. They don’t need any change and have tried their level best to contain the sexual offenders and their potential threat to the children. These laws also protect children from their own parent and the vulnerable children from the uncontrollable sexual predators. The laws have taken a newer direction in maximum protection of tomorrow’s generation.

Buy custom Georgia’s Approach to Sexual Predators essay

Order Now
Order nowhesitating

Related essays

  1. Human Behaviour in Social Places
  2. Innovative Challenges Hindering of Organizational Change
  3. Psychological Effects of Asthma on Children
  4. Albert Bandura: Contributions to Psychology
Order now